Saltar a contenido principal


Do you know there’s an XMPP-enabled version of the Fediverse? Here’s an example of one such site:

https://mov.im/

Also, you can set up Friendica to work with XMPP. To wit:

Server admins can configure their ejabberd or prosody XMPP/Jabber servers to authenticate against the Friendica user database. If configured this way, every Friendica account is also a XMPP/Jabber account and can be used with any XMPP/Jabber client.


See also: https://wiki.friendi.ca/docs/chats

So XMPP is a totally valid protocol you can use with the Fediverse right now. As for why few people do this, I don’t know. Maybe they really do believe that Google “killed” XMPP—which is, in fact, untrue.

@fediversenews

in reply to Chris Trottier

random question. Did ICQ use its own protocol or was it XMPP? Somewhere in the recesses of my backups I have a Jabber client and username. It’s been awhile. I wonder if the Fediverse does manage to take over for the corporate entities, if any of these older/alternative clients might gravitate to ActivityPub/XMPP/Fediverse just to gain relevance?
in reply to Chris Alemany🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇸

From ICQ2000 it was the AIM messaging protocol, prior to that it was a different proprietary protocol. Given, ICQ as Mail.ru largely has Russian and some Hong Kong users it's probably not a good choice today.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I never understood the whole XMPP killed by Facebook thing. Like you used to be able to use XMPP on Facebook but they broke that on purpose. But just look up XMPP on any software repository or App Store and you’ll find plenty of XMPP to behold. It’s never been the case you couldn’t just spin up your own Jabber server or anything. #Meta #Facebook #XMPP #Fediverse
in reply to AudraTran :debian:

There’s such a thing as specialist standards. The majority of people have no need for .svg image formats. And yet it is a standard.

That said, when it comes to chat, there are many competing standards—even in the open source world.

in reply to Chris Trottier

but presumably the majority of those "specialists" are using that standard for it's intended purpose? If you invented a new standard and sent a vector image to someone in .abc and the software they used couldn't do anything with that file, would it be useful?
in reply to AudraTran :debian:

bingo. Like many others back in the day, I started using XMPP to communicate with friends on multiple platforms. Many of them shifted over to Google because they could still communicate with all of us (and the software was better) or to FB (which is where they had all their other connections). Then we couldn't communicate with each other so even though I hadn't personally shifted to Google or FB, #XMPP wasn't useful any more for me. So I mostly stopped using it.

@robertnorlyn

in reply to Jon

to be fair that's not the only reason XMPP hasn't made more progress.

Last week somebody asked me to use XMPP for an encrypted convo. I signed up for a new account, looked at a "best XMPP clients 2023" page and dowloaded the top recommentation: my old friend Adium. But it didn't support encryption. Oh. He recommended some other client ... which doesn't run on Mac. I found another client which does have encryption but crashes once a day. Sigh.

@robertnorlyn

Esta entrada fue editada (hace 10 meses)
in reply to Jon

Wait, which page did recommend "Adium" to you? A 2 seconds look at Wikipedia and you'll see that last stable release was *6 years ago*.

Nowadays I think that the best available options on Mac OS are https://beagle.im/ and https://monal-im.org/

There is a nice page on XMPP official website to find one: https://xmpp.org/software/

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Goffi

Note that I'm not blaming end-user for that, honestly it's overcomplicated to find the right client.

I guess you found this page: https://www.slant.co/topics/1371/~best-jabber-xmpp-clients-for-mac-os-x . It's totally outdated and generally wrong recommandations, I guess it's automated or semi automated. Comments are better though (they notice the deprecated status of Adium).

This kind of pages contribute to the bad reputation of #XMPP

XMPP official website it the best place to check for that.

#xmpp
Esta entrada fue editada (hace 10 meses)

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Robbie Norlyn, Author 👾

At the risk of being labelled "reply guy" and getting dismissed, the point made us that GTalk & FB Messenger effectively killed of the federation aspect of XMPP. Sure, many consumer services & enterprises use XMPP-based systems but I am not sure many federate among themselves.

To be sure, the fault lines were built into its architecture as is the case with AP based federation. At least WebRTC gives a way out for RTC; not sure abt social sharing.
@atomicpoet@fediversenews

in reply to Craig Nicol

that's definitely out of scope. Also, Chris isn't a Calckey developer, so he probably won't be able to answer technical or roadmap related questions.
in reply to Chris Trottier

fantastic!!!
It looks like ActivityPubs and XMPP have finely come together!!!

I've been hoping someone would do this. Then, in the XMPP app, enable the encryption 🥰😍

Esta entrada fue editada (hace 10 meses)
in reply to Occupy Journey 🐧🇺🇲♒🌎

I'm too dumb to follow this right now. mov.im I've already used - but if my XMPP handle is thomas@locomotive.org - how am I supposed to add this mov.im user from Mastodon, for example?
locomotive.org doesn't understand ActivityPub then!?
in reply to Occupy Journey 🐧🇺🇲♒🌎

On both instances I'm using there's not just one known found at mov.im.
From my XMPP-account I can find my Mastodon- and Friendica-account via mov.im, but I don't see any content and the request seem to end... nowhere? Very confusing to me.
in reply to Oliver (FKK positiv 🏖️)

I'm sorry. I'm not the admin.

It looks like you sign up for a Mastodon account on mov.im and they automatically setup a XMPP account on their system too. Then you can add the XMPP account to your XMPP app.

I haven't tried it yet, sorry.